"playing on a seashore"
"Both the victor and the vanquished are but drops of dew, but bolts of lightning —thus should we view the world." -Ouchi Yoshitaka (1507/1551).
|20140306 173516 Z||The truth about idling a vehicle||/www.upworth … it-aint-2?c=ufb2||Sustainability||If you need to idle for more than 10 s, then it is more fuel efficient to turn the car off, then on again.|
|20140221 151653 Z||Space Elevators Are 'Possible' Says New Study||www.huffingt … e_n_4821785.html||Nanotechnology, Solar, Space, Space Elevator, TECH||A rare mention of space elevators in main stream media. The necessary tech (esp CNT & solar) is developing nicely so space elevators are likely to become a reality. FYI: http://www.space.com/24739-space-elevator-tether-technology.html, has a bit more meat but it's not as mainstream.|
|20140213 152655 Z||Mathematics: Why the brain sees maths as beauty||www.bbc.co.u … ronment-26151062||Art, Beauty, Cool, Math, Mind, TECH||Apparently math/abstract beauty excites the same parts of the brain as sensory beauty.|
|20140210 184838 Z||Why we should give free money to everyone||/decorrespon … 0798745-cb9fbb39||Economy, Inspiring, Money, World||The concept (and experimental results) of "Basic income" [W] is mind blowing.|
|20140210 160545 Z||Perils of Lady Gaming||observationd … 365/@laurendavis||Comics, Funny, Images, Inspiring, Play, Relations, Sad, Sex||Glorious and sad. The freedom to play. A good part of appreciating where we are and where we can go, depends on knowing where we've been.|
|20140207 151526 Z||Catching a lift to space||asia.nikkei. … -a-lift-to-space||Engineering, Hardware, Nanotechnology, Space, TECH||This time around they reached 1.2 Km. Next year's goal: 2 Km. Goal for 2020: 15 Km. 50-100 Km is "space". We need more nanotube work!|
We've been distracted by the stunning advances that information technology has brought us, to the exclusion of very deeply held needs that we have in society.
In college I could barely do chemical engineering because I was so distracted by computers! The Web wasn't even up then, so people have even more distractions now.
Cosmos has, as its mission statement, the effort to convey to you why science matters. That is a different motivating factor than "Here's all this science I want to teach you."
There is so much mind in science that people forget that it has so much heart in it too.
Last night I attended the inaugral meeting [http://www.meetup.com/Health-Data-Liberation/events/156222932/] of the Meetup group "Health Data Liberation" [http://www.meetup.com/Health-Data-Liberation/]. The meeting was run by Dr Rebecca Wurtz, an Epidemiologist at Northwestern. 2-3 dozen attended including doctors, folks in BI & analytics, several in the open data movement, a fellow from payers, etc. There was a vigorous and enthusiastic discussion, that was not dominated by any one individual.
There was much discussed, and I just want to hit on a few key points.
Issue: Trust. Different systems already have our data. But who do we trust to merge data? How can we trust them? The data merging entity would have to promise to be the end-of-line as far as identified data, if they want to share the merged data, then they could only share de-identified data. The entity would have to have strong security and impoorting arrangements. Each person would have the right to their own data and to pull out at any time.
Issue: De-identifying data. There was much involved in suspending disbelief that we could actually de-identify data --especially once a data set has been merged with other data sets. The HIPAA standard for de-identification (45 CFR 164.514) does not stop people from using their Sherlock skills to identify people in merged data sets without the name, gender, address, date of birth, etc.
Issue: Name. It also became apparent that since we want the data to be as wide and complete as possible. The term "health data" is too restrictive. Perhaps "life data"?
Issue: Falsified data. We may like the concept of the quantified self, but did you really do 1000 push ups in 30 minutes today? It seems that we need external parties to provide some degree of validation of the data.
Issue: Select which data sets to share. People may be OK sharing most health data but not genomic data or book purchases. The People should be able to choose which data set (hospital, pharmacy, payers, labs, medical & exercise devices, Google, Amazon, genome, banks, utilities, etc) they want merged into the open data set. They should be able to do this in batches or stream, scheduled or one-offs.
Issue: Sharing data. I'm guessing that this will probably go the Semantic Web route with RDF, but in the meantime we have to deal with HL7 v2, HL7 v3, HL7 FHIR, EDI 837s, XDS, etc, etc. And that's not even talking about the non-health data sources.
Issue: Analysis. Open life data is in the twilight zone between collecting data and analyzing it. While systems already collect and analyze internal & proprietary data, no one is up to sharing the data for de-identification and open analysis yet. We didn't discuss the kinds of open analysis that could be done, but perhaps that would need to be a separate discussion because the other issues overshadow this one.
Issue: Starting. My guess is we'd have to start with small set of people who volunteer to make their life data open (but de-identified!) at some site X. Then they can choose which data sets to share their identified data with X. Site X would merge different identified data set but only share a de-identified data set to anyone. If successful, then there will probably be ways to incentivize people to participate in the data liberation.
Open data, open source. For the tldnr crowd:
This morning I walked by a building where some parts were covered with with windows and other parts with embedded stones. I saw people with window-washing scaffolding on the stone parts, so I assume that they were not window-washing but stone-washing.
An image popped into my mind of mountain water running over mountain stones. An image of water cleaning stones year after year, scrubbing stones down molecules at a time. I found it to be a beautiful concept. It was natural, clean, out of the city. It was redemption of mind, a renewal of spirit. The concept of it was more beautiful than the image.
Find beauty with the mind and heart, as well as the eyes, mouth, and ears.
Happy Birthday Kirk Douglas!
Just in case the link ever goes bad, here's his list: